Studios > Beth Gilfilen



Beth Gilfilen

For me, painting is full of risk, spontaneity, potential.  I choose painting to describe the anxieties of our time. As in life, I manage uncertainty through a conscious tracking of time with fluid paint.  Like a conversation, alternating line and wash test out form and ideas, all the while doing so with abandon; a blind movement forward. I map references to the body and time, forging temporal structures. As I work, the all-encompassing motion of laying down line deviates, sprouting off to create appendages and more fragmented forms. Jaunty, disjointed, fractured entities twist in space and appear on the verge of collapse. I am acutely aware of touch and the reconstruction of spatial memory. A kinetic energy can take over. Often, I interrupt improvisation with more conscious maneuvers. I shift to distant, material concerns as I outline, obliterate the excess, and sometimes create a skim coat through which the painting’s history can be viewed. The best paintings I make are the ones I can’t explain.

In the same way I pollute my abstract paintings with figurative and spatial references, I plan to complicate my working methods through engagement with the other artists and visitors in Newark. Like many artists, I am a very private artist. However, I am at a point in my work in which I sense a great need to get out of my comfort zone, and be challenged by my peers, my audience, and whomever visits my studio. Rather than beginning my works with a connection to the materials or myself, I would like start from the outside, collecting a series of responses from other residents that describe what their thoughts are on the “zeitgeist” of our time. This project could extend to other groups, such as local schools, or collections of statements from blogs, or from newspapers.   

Polling, like abstraction, is a type of mapping can be understood in terms of a consensus. I would like to translate how these groups perceive our times into a series of large-scale paintings on primed paper. This method relieves me of the preciousness of working on canvases, yet I can still move around on the paper, perhaps cutting sections and reorienting those during the course of the residency. This could result in imagery that utilizes a very abstract language, or could incorporate more literal forms. I am open to whatever happens. The inability of symbols to adequately quantify experience has always been important in my work, yet I plan to challenge my own personal preferences. I value the power of how an image can be read, whether abstract or more literal, and would like to honor the perceptions of those around with a me with a project that encompasses their fears, anxieties, and hopes for our times.